I think the key words in this article are investing and
What really matters, Maxlow said, is not what equipment is available, but how teachers use the technology.
"To really change teacher behavior, which in turn changes student learning, is a massive undertaking," he said. "It's far more expensive than buying anything."
A colleague recently told me that a lot of marketers and workshop givers don't bother going to the schools because they say the teachers "don't pay attention in the meetings and refuse to implement the technology." Of course this is all hearsay of hearsay but really doesn't surprise me either.
How can districts keep up with the ever advancing-no ceiling technology? The article says they spent 5.8 million alone in about 2 years.
Are we on track to having kids learning online? I could see the most wealthy having the best equipment and the poorest stuck with handouts and hand-me-downs. How could the poor ever move out of their "caste" if that turns out to be the situation? Their is no way our current system of government could support some way to make things equal.












